马杜罗被抓，委内瑞拉政局会失控吗

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the U.S. military action against Venezuela, which included bombings targeting military and government facilities, and the reported capture of President Maduro [1][2]. - The U.S. conducted a significant military operation involving at least seven explosions and helicopter deployment, indicating a clear objective rather than a symbolic action [1]. - The timing of the U.S. action is linked to President Trump's upcoming State of the Union address, suggesting a need for a demonstrable foreign policy success [2]. Group 2 - The Venezuelan opposition has not issued an official comment on the situation, indicating a lack of clarity regarding the political response to the U.S. actions [3]. - Venezuelan Defense Minister Lopez stated that the country will resist foreign military intervention and is currently assessing casualties from the attacks [3]. - The potential aftermath of Maduro's overthrow raises questions about the power transition, with the constitution designating the Vice President as the successor, but the legitimacy of leadership remains contested [2][3]. Group 3 - The international response includes condemnation from leaders like Cuba's President Diaz-Canel, who labeled the U.S. actions as terrorism against the Venezuelan people [4]. - Analysts suggest that if Maduro's regime falls, the situation could lead to military control over oil regions and possible internal divisions within the military, complicating the political landscape [3]. - The U.S. will need to consider how to effectively dismantle the existing regime and facilitate elections to establish a new government, which will be crucial for translating military success into political stability [3].