Core Viewpoint - The concept of "security development and development security" is emphasized as a core human rights practice, highlighting the interdependence of development and security in the context of human rights discourse among China, Indonesia, and Malaysia [4][6]. Group 1: Human Rights Concepts and Practices - China, Indonesia, and Malaysia share similar human rights concepts rooted in the global South, focusing on development rights such as poverty alleviation, education, and healthcare, while opposing the politicization of human rights [4]. - The differences lie in their institutional approaches: China adopts a state-led model for human-centered development, while Indonesia and Malaysia have established national human rights commissions for oversight and policy recommendations [4]. - All three countries view "security development and development security" as central to human rights practice, representing a diverse exploration of human rights protection among global South nations [4]. Group 2: Realities for Developing Countries - The assertion that "the right to survival and development is the primary basic human right" reflects a realistic approach to addressing urgent issues faced by developing countries, such as poverty and infrastructure deficits [6]. - This perspective prioritizes resources for ensuring basic survival and development, aligning with the notion that development and security are mutually reinforcing [6]. Group 3: Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Age - Common challenges in human rights protection in the digital era include the digital divide affecting access to rights, misinformation disrupting social order, personal data breaches, and algorithmic bias leading to discrimination [8][9]. - These challenges present opportunities for cooperation between China and ASEAN countries in enhancing digital infrastructure, expanding social security coverage, and improving digital security measures [9]. Group 4: China's Role in Global Human Rights Governance - China plays a multifaceted role in global human rights governance as a participant, contributor, and innovator of ideas and systems, advocating for development-oriented human rights cooperation [10]. - The "China human rights governance model" offers an alternative to Western liberal paradigms, emphasizing the importance of structural poverty reduction and social stability in the context of human rights [10]. Group 5: Asian Values and Human Rights - The "Asian values" concept encapsulates a governance approach that prioritizes peace, cooperation, and inclusivity, reflecting the diverse governance experiences of Asian countries [12]. - This framework could serve as a public good for human rights protection among developing countries, promoting a path that integrates development and security into specific policies and collaborative initiatives [12].
东西问丨翟崑:如何理解“安全的发展、发展的安全”这一人权实践理念?
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-03 13:06