美媒震惊：夜深人静之时掳走一国总统，没有比这更肆无忌惮的了

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the unprecedented military intervention by the United States in Venezuela, highlighting President Trump's bold declaration of capturing President Maduro, which has raised significant international concern regarding legality and implications for global power dynamics [1][4][6]. Group 1: Military Action and Its Implications - The military strike against Venezuela is described as Trump's most aggressive foreign military intervention to date, comparable to past operations against Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein [3][4]. - The operation involved elite U.S. Army Delta Force troops forcibly extracting Maduro from his residence, indicating a significant escalation in U.S. pressure on Venezuela [4][6]. - The action is seen as part of a broader U.S. ambition to exert control over the region, reflecting a new version of the Monroe Doctrine [1][6]. Group 2: Legal and Political Reactions - There are significant legal controversies surrounding the U.S. military action, with experts arguing that the use of force violates international law, as it does not meet the criteria for self-defense or humanitarian intervention [7][12]. - Various political figures, including members of Congress, have criticized the military action as illegal and lacking justification, calling for transparency and adherence to international law [10][14]. - International reactions have been mixed, with some countries condemning the U.S. actions as aggressive and a violation of sovereignty, while others, like Ukraine and Argentina, expressed support for the U.S. [11][15]. Group 3: Global Reactions and Consequences - The event has prompted strong condemnations from multiple countries, including Cuba, Mexico, and Iran, which view the U.S. actions as acts of terrorism and violations of international norms [11][12][13]. - The European Union has taken a more cautious stance, urging restraint while acknowledging the illegitimacy of Maduro's government [14]. - The United Nations Secretary-General expressed shock at the military actions and warned of potential regional destabilization, emphasizing the need for adherence to international law [16][17].