Core Viewpoint - Concerns have been raised by lawmakers regarding the Trump administration's actions to capture Venezuelan President Maduro without seeking congressional authorization, questioning the legality and intentions behind these military operations [1][2][3] Group 1: Legislative Concerns - Democratic lawmakers in Congress have expressed worries about the legality of the Trump administration's actions in Venezuela, particularly regarding the lack of congressional authorization [1] - Senator Jeanne Shaheen highlighted discrepancies between the administration's assurances of not seeking regime change and the military actions taken, indicating a lack of clarity on the long-term strategy [1] - Senator Andy Kim criticized Secretary of State Rubio and Defense Secretary Hegseth for allegedly misleading Congress about the government's intentions in Venezuela, labeling the actions as "disastrous" for U.S. global standing [1] Group 2: Political Reactions - Senator Tim Kaine condemned the Trump administration for not seeking legal authorization from Congress before placing military personnel in danger, emphasizing the need for legislative oversight [2] - Democratic candidates campaigning for the midterm elections have quickly condemned Republican lawmakers for failing to restrain Trump, which they believe has facilitated unauthorized military actions in Venezuela [2] - Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez denounced the military action, asserting that the true aim is not to combat drugs but to instigate regime change and secure oil resources in Venezuela [2] Group 3: Criticism of Military Strategy - Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer described Trump's military plans for Venezuela as "reckless," stating that the administration had previously assured him that there would be no military actions or attempts at regime change [3]
美多名国会议员质疑特朗普政府对委军事行动合法性
Yang Shi Xin Wen·2026-01-03 23:02