牛弹琴：美国这次入侵，未必都是坏事

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shift of the United States from being perceived as a global police force to a bully, highlighting the implications of this change for international relations and the geopolitical landscape [2][34]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Reactions - Trump expressed satisfaction with the U.S. military operation to capture Maduro, claiming it was a display of U.S. power and control over Venezuela [4][34]. - The U.S. aims to maintain control over Venezuela's oil resources without incurring costs, indicating a focus on economic benefits from the operation [35]. - The Chinese government condemned the U.S. actions as a violation of international law and an infringement on Venezuela's sovereignty, reflecting a broader international backlash against U.S. intervention [8][37]. Group 2: Regional Implications - The operation has instilled fear in Latin American countries, forcing them to confront the reality of U.S. dominance and the potential for violent repercussions [15][43]. - Latin American leaders, except for a few, have condemned the U.S. actions, indicating a shift in regional dynamics and a potential for increased hostility towards the U.S. [44][46]. - The article suggests that the U.S. may face a more adversarial Latin America as a result of its aggressive actions, which could lead to further conflicts [18][46]. Group 3: Moral and Ethical Considerations - The U.S. military's display of power has led to a loss of moral authority, as the actions are seen as a blatant disregard for international law [21][52]. - The article argues that while military might can achieve short-term goals, it ultimately undermines trust and credibility on the global stage [55][59]. - The silence of Western nations in response to U.S. actions highlights a double standard in international relations, raising questions about the integrity of global governance [28][56]. Group 4: Precedent and Future Risks - The U.S. has set a dangerous precedent by intervening in the affairs of a sovereign nation, which could encourage similar actions by other countries [31][59]. - The article warns that the current geopolitical climate may lead to increased chaos and conflict as nations respond to the U.S. example [60].