抓捕马杜罗，不是门罗主义，而是一个新模式的开始

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article discusses the significant shift in U.S. foreign policy, particularly the direct military action against Venezuela, which marks a departure from previous strategies and aligns with the Monroe Doctrine [1][5] - The U.S. government's recent actions, including the capture of Venezuelan President Maduro, reflect a return to a more interventionist stance, reminiscent of historical precedents like the invasion of Panama in 1989 [1][3] - The article argues that the current globalized context renders the Monroe Doctrine outdated, as the interconnectedness of economies and global challenges necessitates cooperation rather than isolation [5][6] Group 2 - The historical context of the Monroe Doctrine is explored, highlighting its original purpose as a strategic tool for U.S. expansion in the Americas while preventing European interference [2][3] - The article contrasts past U.S. isolationist tendencies with the current geopolitical landscape, emphasizing that the era of geographical isolation is no longer feasible due to advancements in technology and global supply chains [5][6] - The implications of Trump's actions are analyzed, suggesting that while they may appear to align with Monroe Doctrine principles, they ultimately reflect a misunderstanding of contemporary global dynamics [5][6]