《纽约时报》批特朗普掳走马杜罗:非法且不明智
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-04 04:34

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent military action by the U.S. against Venezuela, highlighting the illegality and potential consequences of such actions, particularly the abduction of President Nicolás Maduro, which is viewed as a significant escalation in U.S. foreign policy [1][2]. Summary by Sections Military Action and Justification - The U.S. has deployed a large military presence in the Caribbean, including an aircraft carrier, at least seven other ships, dozens of aircraft, and 15,000 troops, to threaten Venezuela [2]. - The justification for the military action is framed as a response to alleged drug trafficking, but the article argues that Venezuela is not a major producer of drugs like fentanyl, which is a significant issue in the U.S. [3][4]. Historical Context and Lessons - The article references historical failures of U.S. military interventions in countries like Afghanistan, Libya, and Iraq, suggesting that attempts to overthrow even the most despised regimes can lead to worse outcomes [3][4]. - It emphasizes that U.S. interventions in Latin America have historically destabilized countries, citing examples from Chile, Cuba, Guatemala, and Nicaragua [3]. Legal and Political Implications - The article criticizes President Trump's actions as lacking legal justification, noting that he has not sought Congressional approval for military action, which is constitutionally required [5][6]. - It highlights that Trump's administration's rationale for attacking Venezuelan vessels is seen as legally and logically flawed, with many experts disputing the claims of an imminent threat [5][6]. Potential Consequences - The potential for increased violence and instability in Venezuela is significant, with concerns that the removal of Maduro could lead to chaos rather than a peaceful transition of power [7]. - The article warns that further turmoil could disrupt global energy and food markets and exacerbate the refugee crisis in the region [7]. Conclusion - The article concludes that Trump's military actions may lead to more suffering for the Venezuelan people and long-term damage to U.S. global interests, asserting that these actions violate legal standards [7].