新华社评美国抓走马杜罗：赤裸裸的霸权行径

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the blatant display of U.S. hegemony through military action against Venezuela, including the abduction of President Maduro and the subsequent announcement of U.S. oil companies' investments in Venezuela's oil infrastructure [1][2] - The U.S. actions are compared to historical imperialistic practices, revealing a pattern of military intervention followed by resource exploitation, which disregards international law and reflects a return to colonial-era behaviors [1][2] - International reactions to the U.S. actions include condemnation from various global leaders and organizations, emphasizing the threat to international law and the potential for similar actions against other nations [2][3] Group 2 - The narrative suggests that the U.S. promotes a so-called "rules-based international order," which is actually a facade for pursuing American interests through coercive means [3]