拉美学者谈美突袭委内瑞拉：需警惕被强化的“门罗主义”

Core Viewpoint - The large-scale military action by the United States against Venezuela, including the arrest of President Maduro and his wife, has sparked widespread condemnation from the international community, raising concerns about a reinforced "Monroe Doctrine" that could lead to direct interventions across Latin America [1]. Group 1: International Reactions - Latin American scholars warn that the U.S. actions violate fundamental principles of international law and could set a dangerous precedent for military intervention in sovereign nations [1]. - Martín Unzué, a director at the Buenos Aires University, emphasizes that the notion of Venezuelan oil belonging to the U.S. reflects a return to blatant interventionism, driven by corporate greed and the pursuit of wealth [1]. - The military intervention in Venezuela has led to concerns that Mexico and Colombia may be next on the U.S. intervention list, indicating a potential expansion of the Monroe Doctrine [1]. Group 2: Sovereignty Concerns - Fernando Astango, a professor at the University of Santiago, describes the U.S. action as a severe violation of the sovereignty of Venezuela and the broader South American region, characterizing it as a blatant act of aggression against international law and the UN Charter [1]. - The current situation is seen as a real-world demonstration of the "Monroe Doctrine Trump thesis," suggesting that any country opposing U.S. interests could become a target for similar actions in the future [1].