Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the aggressive military actions taken by the U.S. against Venezuela, which include the abduction of President Maduro and the subsequent declaration of U.S. management over Venezuela's resources, particularly its oil industry [1][2] - The U.S. military operation is compared to historical acts of colonialism, suggesting a pattern of resource exploitation under the guise of military intervention and regime change [1][2] - International reactions to the U.S. actions indicate widespread condemnation, with various leaders and organizations emphasizing the violation of international law and the potential for increased global instability [2][3] Group 2 - The articles suggest that the U.S. narrative of a "rules-based international order" is fundamentally a facade for pursuing its own interests, revealing a pattern of predatory behavior [3]
新华社：美国抓走马杜罗 图穷匕见 不过如此
Xin Hua She·2026-01-04 10:20