环球时报社评：美国突袭委内瑞拉拉响全球治理警报

Core Viewpoint - The military action by the United States against Venezuela has sparked widespread condemnation and is seen as a dangerous precedent for international relations, undermining the authority of international law and the principles of the United Nations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Impact on Latin America and the Caribbean - The military action has severely disrupted peace in the Latin American and Caribbean region, which has historically been viewed as one of the most peaceful areas globally [2]. - The region, comprising 33 countries, had previously declared itself a "zone of peace" in 2014, highlighting the importance of maintaining stability [2]. - The actions taken by the U.S. raise concerns among Latin American nations about their own security, as they fear being targeted next under similar justifications [2]. Group 2: Global Governance and Power Dynamics - The crisis reflects a significant imbalance in the global governance system, where hegemonic powers can act without effective constraints, leading to violations of international norms [3]. - The current international power dynamics have evolved, but the governance structures have not kept pace, resulting in a lack of representation and voice for developing countries [3]. - The U.S. intervention exemplifies how existing global governance mechanisms fail to hold hegemonic actions accountable, allowing for unchecked behavior [3]. Group 3: Historical Context and Future Implications - Historical evidence suggests that military interventions do not lead to lasting stability but rather sow the seeds for future conflicts [4]. - The U.S. has been criticized for undermining international order rather than upholding it, which has long-term implications for global governance and regional peace [4]. - The crisis emphasizes the need for a collective international response to counteract hegemonic practices and promote a more equitable global governance framework [4].