特朗普宣称要“接管”委内瑞拉，可行吗？

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. military operation to capture Venezuelan President Maduro is seen as a significant step in U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the context of anti-drug efforts, but the primary goal appears to be political rather than purely anti-drug related [1][2]. Group 1: Military Action and Strategy - The U.S. military's operation, named "Absolute Resolve," involved a targeted approach to capture Maduro, avoiding a full-scale invasion due to the geographical challenges and the potential for a prolonged conflict [1][2]. - The Venezuelan military possesses modern equipment that could pose a threat to U.S. operations, necessitating a strategy focused on precision strikes rather than large-scale ground invasions [2]. - The U.S. aims to create internal instability within Venezuela by spreading fear and conducting secret operations, contrasting with previous failed attempts at regime change [2]. Group 2: Political Implications - Following Maduro's capture, the U.S. plans to temporarily "take over" Venezuela and may establish a transitional government, with significant investments from U.S. energy companies promised to improve living standards [4]. - According to Venezuelan constitutional law, the Vice President, Delcy Rodríguez, is expected to assume the presidency temporarily, but this situation is complicated by the nature of Maduro's capture [5]. - Rodríguez's willingness to cooperate with the U.S. contrasts sharply with her public condemnation of the military action, indicating potential internal divisions within the Venezuelan government [6][7]. Group 3: Regional Reactions - Colombia has responded swiftly by deploying troops to its border to manage potential refugee crises resulting from the upheaval in Venezuela [10]. - Leftist governments in Latin America have condemned the U.S. actions as violations of sovereignty, while right-wing leaders have welcomed the intervention as a step towards democracy [10][11]. - The situation highlights a significant divide in regional responses, with some countries supporting U.S. actions and others viewing them as imperialistic [11][12]. Group 4: Future Uncertainties - The power vacuum left by Maduro's capture raises questions about the future governance of Venezuela, with potential reliance on existing political structures and military figures [8][12]. - The ongoing debate over the legitimacy of U.S. intervention and the reactions from Latin American countries suggest that the crisis in Venezuela is far from resolved [12].