图穷匕见,不过如此

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the U.S. military's large-scale operation against Venezuela, which resulted in the capture of President Maduro and the subsequent declaration by President Trump that the U.S. will "manage" Venezuela, allowing American oil companies to invest billions in the country's oil infrastructure [1][2]. Group 1 - The U.S. military's actions are characterized as blatant acts of hegemony, with the operation being compared to the Iraq War, highlighting a pattern of resource imperialism [1]. - The transition from "judicial justice" to "oil business" illustrates a complete disregard for international law, showcasing a modern form of piracy where the U.S. uses military force to overthrow sovereign governments and seize natural resources [1]. - The operation has drawn criticism even within the U.S., with lawmakers questioning its constitutional legitimacy and expressing concerns about the implications for international order [2]. Group 2 - The actions of the U.S. are seen as a threat to global peace and security, prompting calls from allies, including the EU, to respect international law and the principles of the UN Charter [2]. - The invasion has led to a growing realization that the so-called "rules-based international order" promoted by the U.S. is actually a "predatory order based on U.S. interests" [2].