国内严令禁止 海外指手画脚

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the double standards exhibited by the United States regarding the regulation of smartphone use among minors, highlighting the contrast between domestic policies and criticisms of similar measures in other countries [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Regulations on Smartphone Use - Over half of U.S. states have implemented strict regulations on smartphone use in schools, with New York being a notable example of a state that has enacted a comprehensive ban on smartphone usage during school hours [2]. - The movement began in 2023, with Florida being the first state to completely prohibit smartphone use during teaching hours, leading to a chain reaction of similar laws across 26 states [2]. - The regulations aim to address the rising issues of smartphone addiction among minors, which have been linked to increased rates of depression and suicide among American youth [2]. Group 2: Criticism of Other Countries' Policies - The U.S. government has criticized similar measures taken by other countries, labeling them as "digital authoritarianism" while framing its own regulations as necessary for protecting minors [3][4]. - The U.S. has established a narrative that equates restrictions on smartphone use in other nations with violations of human rights, despite these measures being aimed at safeguarding youth [3][4]. - Countries like China have implemented effective measures to protect minors from excessive smartphone use, which have been recognized by international observers as worthy of emulation, yet the U.S. continues to dismiss these efforts as infringements on digital rights [4]. Group 3: Global Implications of U.S. Double Standards - The U.S. double standards in digital governance undermine global cooperation in addressing issues related to youth smartphone addiction and other digital challenges [5]. - The politicization of public policy regarding minors' protection has been criticized by international organizations, emphasizing that such policies should be respected regardless of cultural or ideological differences [5]. - Experts have pointed out that the U.S. approach to regulating smartphone use among minors is counterproductive to global efforts, as it fosters division rather than collaboration in tackling shared challenges [5].