综合消息｜多国政党组织和学者：美国打击委内瑞拉威胁地区和平安全

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the large-scale military action initiated by the United States against Venezuela, which resulted in the capture of President Maduro and his wife, with widespread condemnation from various political parties and scholars who argue that the action is a violation of Venezuela's sovereignty and international law, aimed at controlling Venezuela's resources [1][2][3][4][5]. Group 1: International Reactions - Over 2000 people protested in Paris against the U.S. military action, with leaders claiming it is a guise for imperialism aimed at seizing Venezuelan oil resources [1]. - Thousands gathered in Madrid to protest the military intervention, labeling it an illegal invasion of Venezuela's sovereignty [2]. - German political figures condemned the U.S. actions as state terrorism and a dangerous shift in international order, emphasizing the lack of UN authorization [3]. - The South African Communist Party criticized the U.S. actions as imperialist aggression that threatens regional peace and stability [3]. - Various international leaders and scholars highlighted the historical precedent of U.S. interventions and the potential for significant disruption in international political systems [4][5]. Group 2: Implications for International Law - The military action is viewed as a blatant violation of the United Nations Charter and fundamental principles of international law, raising concerns about the establishment of dangerous precedents for global governance [5]. - Experts argue that the U.S. aims to install a puppet government in Venezuela to control its natural resources, particularly oil, which poses a threat to other nations in the region [5]. - The actions taken by the U.S. are seen as a reassertion of the Monroe Doctrine, which is particularly alarming for Latin American countries [3].