深夜潜入快递点“拿”走自己下单的快递，一男子被批捕

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal implications of the "rent-to-own" shopping model, emphasizing that consumers do not gain ownership of goods until all contractual obligations are fulfilled, and any attempt to unlawfully take possession of goods constitutes theft [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Implications - The accused, Chen, utilized a "rent-to-own" model to acquire a mobile phone, paying only a deposit of 100 yuan, which does not confer ownership until full payment is made [1][2]. - Chen's actions of taking the phone without paying the rental fee and subsequently stealing it demonstrate a clear intent to unlawfully possess someone else's property [2]. - The mobile phone's value was assessed at 7500 yuan, qualifying the theft as "large amount" under criminal law, leading to formal charges against Chen [2]. Group 2: Consumer Awareness and Legal Consequences - The case serves as a reminder for consumers to understand the distinction between placing an order and owning the item, particularly in new consumption models [2]. - Legal authorities stress that the rapid growth of e-commerce and rental models does not exempt consumers from legal responsibilities, and any exploitation of loopholes will result in legal repercussions [2].