拉丁美洲的血管再次被美国切开

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. military intervention in Venezuela aims to control the country's oil resources and facilitate a regime change, marking a significant escalation in U.S.-Venezuela relations [1][6]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Strategies - The U.S. has escalated sanctions against Venezuela, imposing a 25% tariff on countries purchasing Venezuelan oil and forcibly selling the country's assets in the U.S. [1][6]. - The U.S. has redefined Maduro as a terrorist and the Venezuelan government as a foreign terrorist organization to justify military actions [1][6]. - Military actions have evolved from targeting drug trafficking vessels to large-scale operations, including air and ground strikes to capture Maduro and his wife [1][6]. Group 2: Political Implications in Latin America - The U.S. aims to reshape the political landscape in Latin America, particularly targeting leftist governments in the region, as part of a broader strategy to establish a new political order aligned with U.S. interests [2][7]. - The U.S. plans to dismantle the "Bolivarian Alliance," a leftist coalition in Latin America, following changes in Venezuela's political situation [3][8]. - The intervention is expected to influence upcoming elections in Colombia, Mexico, and Brazil, potentially leading to a shift towards right-wing politics in the region [4][9]. Group 3: Broader Geopolitical Context - The U.S. intervention reflects a shift from globalism to pragmatism in its foreign policy, with a focus on reasserting dominance in its "backyard" [2][7]. - The political changes in Venezuela may have significant spillover effects, potentially accelerating a rightward shift in Latin American politics and challenging leftist movements in neighboring countries [4][9]. - The rise of conservative alliances in Latin America, as indicated by Argentina's President Milei, aligns with U.S. interests and the goals of the "New Monroe Doctrine" [4][10].