Capital Account: The U.S. had countless reasons for wanting regime change in Venezuela. Yet one factor appears to have been decisive for President Trump: oil.

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolving interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine under the current administration, emphasizing that commerce and resources are central to U.S. strategic interventions, with Greenland potentially being the next focus for U.S. interests [1] Group 1: U.S. Strategic Intervention - The current administration's approach to the Monroe Doctrine prioritizes economic interests and resource acquisition as key drivers for U.S. intervention in foreign territories [1] - Greenland is highlighted as a potential target for U.S. strategic interests due to its resources and geopolitical significance [1] Group 2: Economic Implications - The emphasis on commerce suggests a shift in U.S. foreign policy, where economic motivations may lead to increased involvement in regions rich in natural resources [1] - The article implies that this approach could reshape international relations, particularly in areas like the Arctic, where resource competition is intensifying [1]