Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that the original operator of a swimming and fitness center is responsible for compensating a member for losses incurred due to the closure of the facility after a transfer of ownership, as the transfer was made without the consent of the member holding an unexpired membership card [6][7]. Group 1: Case Background - A member named Jiang purchased a six-month fitness card for 800 yuan, valid from September 16, 2023, to March 16, 2024 [4]. - The original operator, Wen, transferred the gym to Dong on December 5, 2023, with an agreement that Dong would assume responsibility for the existing members, but Dong soon closed the facility [4][5]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Jiang filed a lawsuit against both Wen and the gym, arguing that he was unaware of the transfer and that Wen should be liable for the refund since he paid Wen directly [5]. - Wen claimed he was not responsible for refunds as he had transferred the gym and paid Dong a transfer fee of 70,000 yuan to take on the obligations [5]. Group 3: Court Ruling - The court determined that Wen remained liable for the debt incurred during his tenure as the operator, as the transfer of obligations to Dong was not valid without Jiang's consent [6][7]. - The court ordered Wen to refund Jiang 400 yuan for the unused portion of the membership [6]. Group 4: Expert Analysis - Legal experts emphasized the importance of consumer rights in cases of business ownership transfer, highlighting that consumers should be notified and have the right to consent to any transfer of their membership rights [8]. - The case illustrates the need for clarity in the responsibilities of original and new operators in consumer contracts, especially in businesses with prepaid services [8].
健身馆转让后停业 健身会员该找谁赔？
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-05 19:46