约旦专栏作家：入侵委内瑞拉是美国的新败笔

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that the U.S. military and political intervention in Venezuela represents not only an aggression against a sovereign nation but also a dangerous gamble of American hegemony on a global scale [1] Group 1: U.S. Actions and Motivations - The U.S. has launched military actions to forcibly control Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife, bringing them to New York for trial, which is described as a "Hollywood-style" farce [1] - Washington's message is clear: it can act without regard for legal or moral standards to eliminate opponents, driven by the desire for hegemony, control over the populace, and resource acquisition [1] Group 2: Legal and Ethical Implications - The U.S. claims to have captured Maduro based on his alleged involvement in drug trafficking, yet the Trump administration has failed to provide any evidence to support this claim [1] - Even if the allegations were true, international law does not permit the U.S. to invade other countries for "law enforcement," constituting a blatant violation of national sovereignty [1] Group 3: Consequences of Intervention - The article suggests that the U.S. action is a continuation of its outdated formula for global intervention, indicating a reckless political and military gamble [1] - Venezuela is expected to join the long list of U.S. foreign interventions that have failed to achieve their intended goals, with resource plundering as the underlying motive likely to backfire on the U.S. itself [1]