美国“摊牌”了？特朗普再提“夺岛”！

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. President Trump has expressed a strong interest in Greenland, emphasizing its importance for national security and appointing a special envoy for the island, which has led to significant diplomatic tensions with Denmark and other Nordic countries [1][3]. Geopolitical and Strategic Importance - Greenland, the world's largest island, is strategically located between the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans, making it a crucial point for trade routes as Arctic ice melts [3]. - The Arctic shipping routes have seen a 37% increase in vessel traffic from 2013 to 2023, highlighting the growing commercial value of these waterways [3]. - Experts view Greenland as a "highway" connecting the Arctic and North America, with its strategic significance expected to increase as climate change alters the region [3]. Resource Wealth - Greenland is rich in natural resources, including 1.5 million tons of rare earth elements, 17.5 billion barrels of untapped oil, and 4.15 trillion cubic meters of natural gas [3][4]. - The interest in Greenland is driven by both economic and military considerations, as these resources are critical for energy transition and technology manufacturing [4]. Historical Context of U.S. Interest - The U.S. has a long history of interest in Greenland, dating back to attempts to purchase the island in 1867 and 1946, both of which were rejected by Denmark [6]. - The U.S. has established military bases in Greenland, which are vital for Arctic defense, and has sought to redefine the island's geopolitical status [6][7]. International Reactions - European nations, including Denmark, Finland, and Norway, have publicly supported Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland, rejecting U.S. claims [8]. - The potential U.S. control over Greenland is seen as a threat to NATO and the post-World War II international order, with experts warning of severe geopolitical repercussions [10]. Implications for Global Order - If the U.S. were to exert control over Greenland, it could fundamentally disrupt the established international order and NATO's collective defense commitments [10]. - The situation poses risks of escalating tensions between the U.S. and Europe, potentially leading to a reconfiguration of global power dynamics and a new arms race [10].