专家：美对委袭击是“头疼医脚”“内病外治”

Core Viewpoint - The recent military action by the United States against Venezuela, including the forced removal of President Maduro, contradicts the government's previous stance of non-intervention in foreign regimes, indicating a shift towards a more aggressive foreign policy aimed at achieving geopolitical objectives [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Military Action and Domestic Politics - The military action reflects a dominant aggressive stance within U.S. political circles, with a shift towards more extreme measures being supported by key figures in the government [3]. - The timing of the military action is linked to the upcoming midterm elections, suggesting that it serves to demonstrate military capability and address domestic political agendas, including issues like drug control and border security [5]. - The U.S. government's approach is seen as a response to internal political pressures, with military actions being framed as necessary for addressing domestic concerns [5][8]. Group 2: Narrative and Public Perception - The U.S. government has been systematically promoting a narrative of "drug terrorism" to justify its actions, which is perceived as a strategy to shift focus away from unresolved domestic issues such as drug addiction and inflation [10][12]. - Polls indicate that American citizens are more concerned with immigration and inflation, suggesting that the military action against Venezuela may be an attempt to divert attention from these pressing domestic issues [8][12]. - The strategy of "externalizing" domestic problems is viewed as a way to mask the government's failures in managing economic challenges and rising living costs [10][12].