美国学者：这次连“民主”外衣都不披了

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, which is characterized as a blatant disregard for democratic principles and a return to historical patterns of American imperialism in Latin America [1][2] - The Trump administration's actions are framed as a violation of international norms, with various global leaders condemning the intervention as a dangerous precedent and an act of state terrorism [2] - There is significant domestic opposition within the U.S. Congress, with members from both parties labeling the military action as an "illegal war" and a form of American bullying [2][3] Group 2 - The U.S. government has invoked the Monroe Doctrine to justify its intervention, claiming a right to manage Venezuela under the guise of protecting American interests [1] - The response from the international community includes strong denunciations from the United Nations and various countries, emphasizing the risks of escalating violence and undermining multilateralism [2] - Some U.S. diplomats have expressed reluctance to serve in Venezuela if the embassy is reopened, viewing such a position as akin to being part of an occupying force [3]