马杜罗“庭审”细节：多次起坐颇显吃力，称“我将获得自由”！其子哽咽发言：很快我们就会在委内瑞拉重聚

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. military action against Venezuela, involving the forced control and extradition of President Maduro and his wife, has sparked widespread criticism and questioning of U.S. foreign policy [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Military Action - The U.S. military operation involved approximately 200 personnel targeting Maduro's residence in Caracas [5]. - Maduro received a warning only three minutes before the U.S. forces arrived, indicating a surprise attack [5]. - The operation has been characterized as a violation of international norms, with critics arguing it represents an overreach of U.S. military power [1][3]. Group 2: Political Reactions - Democratic leaders in the U.S. Congress have expressed concerns about the legality and implications of the military action, questioning the Trump administration's decision-making [3]. - Maduro's son, Nicolás Maduro Guerra, asserted that the Venezuelan people remain resolute in their pursuit of freedom despite the U.S. actions [3]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - Maduro and his wife appeared in a New York federal court, where they both declared their innocence against the charges brought by the U.S. government [10][12]. - The court proceedings lasted approximately 30 minutes, with the next court date set for March 17 [15]. Group 4: Oil Industry Implications - Following the military action, President Trump indicated intentions to control Venezuela's oil industry, suggesting that U.S. oil companies are prepared to invest significantly to restore Venezuelan oil exports [19][20]. - Venezuela's oil, primarily heavy crude, is seen as complementary to U.S. refining capabilities, which predominantly process lighter crude [19]. - The U.S. has historically imported heavy oil from Venezuela, and the current geopolitical situation may prompt a shift in sourcing strategies [19][20].