壹快评丨拒绝暴力是家庭教育的底线

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court emphasizes a "zero tolerance" policy towards violence against minors by parents or guardians, highlighting the importance of non-violent family education practices [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Responsibilities - The "Family Education Promotion Law" mandates that family education must respect the dignity of minors, protect their privacy, and safeguard their legal rights [2]. - The "Anti-Domestic Violence Law" stipulates that guardians must conduct family education in a civilized manner and are prohibited from committing domestic violence [2]. - Parents are held accountable for their role in family education and cannot justify violent behavior under any circumstances [2][3]. Group 2: Impact of Violence on Minors - Children raised in environments where violence is a common resolution to conflicts may develop patterns of either perpetrating or being subjected to violence [3]. - The Supreme People's Court's case highlights the psychological impact of domestic violence on minors, including the development of depression [1][3]. Group 3: Legal Consequences and Enforcement - The publication of typical cases by the Supreme People's Court signifies an upgrade in the legal status of family education from a private matter to a national concern, indicating stricter legal oversight [3]. - Enforcement mechanisms include mandatory family education guidance orders and potential criminal liability for perpetrators of domestic violence [3].