丹麦首相警告：美国若吞并格陵兰岛，等于北约终结

Core Viewpoint - Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen stated that if the U.S. were to annex Greenland, it would signify the end of NATO as a military alliance [1][3]. Group 1: Political Statements and Reactions - Frederiksen emphasized that an attack by the U.S. on another NATO country would halt everything, including NATO itself and the security system established since World War II [1]. - Norwegian Foreign Minister Eide supported Frederiksen's statement, asserting that if the U.S. attacked Greenland, the concept of NATO would cease to exist [3]. - European leaders, including the UK’s Starmer, expressed solidarity with Denmark, defending its sovereignty over Greenland [3]. Group 2: U.S. Position and Strategy - Trump reiterated the need for U.S. control over Greenland, citing national security concerns and criticizing Denmark's capability to ensure Greenland's security [3]. - The Trump administration has been reinforcing a new strategic framework centered on "hemispheric defense," which includes the assertion of U.S. interests in Greenland [4][5]. - The U.S. has been accused of pursuing a "public referendum" or even a purchase of Greenland, which has been met with strong rejection from Denmark [6]. Group 3: Economic and Geopolitical Implications - Greenland is geographically part of North America, which aligns with the U.S. defense strategy shift towards focusing on domestic and hemispheric security [5]. - Denmark has committed over $4 billion to enhance Greenland's security, including investments in vessels, aircraft, drones, and monitoring systems [5]. - The melting Arctic ice is making Greenland's resources more accessible, which could lead to increased U.S. interest in the region [5].