裁判文书中的法官姓名和案号不该是隐名处理的对象

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the recent decision by courts in multiple regions of China to anonymize the names of judges in judicial documents, raising public concern about transparency in the judicial process [1][2] - The practice of anonymizing judges' names and case numbers is argued to exceed legal boundaries, as these elements are not considered personal privacy and are essential for public knowledge of judicial proceedings [2][3] - Judicial transparency is emphasized as a key aspect of judicial reform, with recent directives from the Supreme People's Court aimed at enhancing public access to judicial information, including case filing and judgment details [2][3] Group 2 - The ongoing reforms in judicial documentation aim to protect personal privacy while maintaining essential transparency, indicating a need for a balanced approach in handling sensitive information [1][3] - The current trend of obscuring critical judicial information is seen as counterproductive to the goals of judicial openness, potentially undermining the credibility and authority of the judicial system [2][3]