视频丨马杜罗夫妇拒绝美方指控 美各界谴责对委军事行动

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal proceedings against Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife in the U.S., highlighting public protests against U.S. intervention in Venezuela and concerns over the implications of such actions for international order and regional security [1][3][5]. Group 1: Public Sentiment and Protests - Protesters in New York demand the release of Maduro and criticize U.S. intervention as lacking legitimacy, viewing it as a political performance [1]. - Many protesters argue that U.S. actions create dangerous precedents and negatively impact regional security and international order [3]. - The protests reflect a broader sentiment that the U.S. is overstepping its bounds as a global power, with calls for an end to military interventions [5]. Group 2: Political Reactions in the U.S. - U.S. lawmakers express strong concerns regarding the legality of military actions against Venezuela, fearing that such interventions could lead to uncontrollable consequences [5][7]. - Senator Chuck Schumer warns that the situation in Venezuela could escalate, drawing parallels to past U.S. military interventions that resulted in significant costs for American families [7]. - Senator Bernie Sanders emphasizes the need for the U.S. government to focus on domestic issues rather than attempting to manage foreign nations, criticizing the imperialistic motives behind the intervention [9]. Group 3: Expert Opinions on U.S. Military Actions - Experts warn that the U.S. misuse of military force and violation of international law could destabilize the region and exacerbate issues like illegal immigration and drug trafficking [10]. - Historical analysis suggests that U.S. military interventions often lead to disastrous outcomes, with unpredictable consequences [12]. - Political scientists highlight the long-term negative effects of continuous warfare on U.S. society, including militarism and xenophobia, echoing historical warnings about the dangers of prolonged conflict [14].