多国专家和媒体批评：这不是庭审而是美式强权秀

Core Viewpoint - The recent court appearance of Venezuelan President Maduro in the U.S. is criticized as a display of American power rather than a legitimate judicial process, with many experts and media labeling it a "power show" [3]. Group 1: Court Proceedings - Maduro declared himself the President of Venezuela and pleaded not guilty to all charges during the court session [2]. - Outside the courtroom, protesters gathered, asserting that the proceedings were merely a televised spectacle and that the U.S. had no right to "judge" foreign leaders [3]. Group 2: International Reactions - Multiple international experts and media outlets condemned the U.S. actions as an attempt to disguise illegal actions under the guise of judicial proceedings, aiming to overthrow Venezuela's legitimate government and seize its resources [3]. - Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez commented on social media, stating that the U.S. intentions are to topple the Venezuelan government [3]. Group 3: Historical Context - This is not the first instance of the U.S. engaging in similar actions; historical examples include the 1989 invasion of Panama and the subsequent trial of Manuel Noriega, as well as the case of former Honduran President Hernández [4]. - The U.S. has a pattern of using judicial processes as tools to serve its hegemonic interests, as noted by the Philadelphia Inquirer regarding the proceedings against Maduro [4].