一边是格陵兰岛，一边是委内瑞拉，欧盟为何双标？

Core Viewpoint - The European Union (EU) exhibits a double standard in its responses to international events, particularly regarding the sovereignty of Greenland and the U.S. military actions in Venezuela, reflecting geopolitical interests and alliances [3][11][12]. Group 1: EU's Response to Greenland and Venezuela - EU spokesperson Anita Heipel emphasized the EU's commitment to uphold national sovereignty and territorial integrity in response to U.S. threats regarding Greenland [1][7]. - In contrast, Heipel's response to the legality of U.S. military actions in Venezuela was vague, stating that it was too early to assess the legal implications due to the ongoing situation [1][12]. Group 2: Geopolitical Implications - The differing responses stem from geopolitical interests, with Greenland's strategic significance and rich mineral resources being crucial for European integration, while Venezuela is viewed as part of the U.S. "backyard" [3][11]. - The EU's ambiguous stance on U.S. actions in Venezuela undermines its efforts to establish a rules-based international order, as it fails to uphold the principles of sovereignty and non-use of force [11][12]. Group 3: Internal EU Dynamics - The EU faces internal divisions regarding its response to U.S. actions, with varying opinions among member states, highlighting the strategic dependency on the U.S. [12][13]. - This dependency complicates the EU's ability to formulate a coherent and independent foreign and security policy, often leading to alignment with U.S. agendas [12][13].