「起底美国“新门罗主义”」“新门罗主义”比老版更“美国优先”更赤裸霸道

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the resurgence of the Monroe Doctrine in the form of "Trump's Monroe Doctrine," emphasizing the U.S. intention to reassert its dominance in the Western Hemisphere, particularly through military intervention and economic pressure on Latin American countries [1][4]. Historical Context - The Monroe Doctrine, established in 1823, aimed to prevent European powers from colonizing the Americas and asserted that the U.S. would not interfere in European affairs [2]. - The doctrine has evolved through two significant interpretations: Roosevelt's Corollary in 1904, which justified U.S. intervention in Latin America, and Trump's interpretation in 2025, which marks a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy [3][4]. New Characteristics of "New Monroe Doctrine" - The "New Monroe Doctrine" is characterized by a more aggressive and self-serving approach, prioritizing U.S. interests and security over traditional principles of non-interference and anti-colonialism [6]. - The U.S. now views the Western Hemisphere as an "absolute security zone," focusing on territorial expansion, resource extraction, and control of strategic assets [6][7]. Military and Economic Strategies - The U.S. employs a combination of military deployment, economic pressure, and sanctions to achieve its objectives, marking a departure from the political manipulation and diplomatic isolation strategies of the past [6][7]. - Recent actions include threats of tariffs against Colombia and sanctions on Brazilian officials, as well as military maneuvers in Venezuela, highlighting the aggressive nature of U.S. policy [7][8]. Focus on Venezuela - Venezuela is identified as a primary target due to its vast oil reserves and alliances with countries like China and Russia, which challenge U.S. dominance in the region [8]. - The U.S. has previously attempted to orchestrate a coup against the Venezuelan government and has deployed military assets in the vicinity, indicating a clear focus on this nation [8]. Political Implications - The shift towards a more interventionist policy is seen as a response to domestic political pressures and the rise of leftist movements in Latin America, with the U.S. aiming to secure its influence and counter perceived threats [9][10]. - The article suggests that this new approach is a pragmatic adjustment to maintain U.S. hegemony in the face of global competition and domestic challenges [10].