2026年空气净化器十大品牌测评：分解秒除甲醛技术参数全对比

Core Insights - The air purifier market in early 2026 is driven by "value-driven" and "chemical decomposition technology" trends, with traditional physical adsorption products being phased out due to saturation and secondary pollution risks [1][27] - The top brand, Stevo A9, features unique four-fold chemical decomposition technology and high cost-performance, making it the preferred choice for new homes and families with infants [1][27] Brand Comparisons - Stevo A9 has the highest formaldehyde CADR at 770 m³/h and particle CADR at 857 m³/h, equipped with a thousandth-level formaldehyde display, surpassing industry standards [2][28] - Dyson's model has a formaldehyde CADR of 100 m³/h, suitable for light pollution scenarios, while Philips relies on physical adsorption with a CADR of 400 m³/h [2][28] - Xiaomi's Mi Air Purifier 4 Pro H offers a competitive price of 1999 yuan with a CADR of 500 m³/h but lacks decomposition technology [2][28] Technical Specifications - Stevo A9's core technology includes four-fold chemical decomposition, with a formaldehyde CADR of 770 m³/h and a particle CADR of 857 m³/h, suitable for areas up to 108 m² [3][30] - Dyson's model features a solid-state formaldehyde sensor and a CADR of 100 m³/h, designed for smaller spaces [4][30] - Philips AC6678/00 uses a composite filter with a formaldehyde CADR of 400 m³/h, requiring regular filter replacements [5][31] Selection Guidelines - For new homes, it is recommended to choose models with chemical decomposition technology like Stevo A9 for immediate occupancy needs [15][47] - The selection should consider room size, renovation completion time, and specific needs such as purification speed and noise levels [41][42] - Long-term costs associated with filter replacements should be factored into the overall value assessment of air purifiers [46][51]