两大体育APP对簿公堂，一审判决：懂球帝构成名誉侵权，被判向直播吧公开致歉并赔偿

Core Viewpoint - The recent court ruling in favor of "Live Bar" against "Dongqiudi" highlights the ongoing legal disputes in the sports app industry, emphasizing the importance of reputation management and the potential financial implications of defamation claims [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Xiamen Siming District People's Court ruled that certain content published by four defendants, including Chen Cong and Beijing Duoge Technology Co., constituted defamation, ordering them to delete related articles, publicly apologize, and jointly compensate Xiamen Aobo Network Technology Co., totaling 121,748 yuan [1][5]. - The legal battle stemmed from a previous investment dispute between Beijing Tianxing Capital and Beijing Duoge Technology, which led to the forced auction of the "Dongqiudi" trademark, ultimately acquired by Aobo for 20.9184 million yuan [3][4]. Group 2: Background and Context - The conflict traces back to 2016 when an investment agreement led to disputes over repayment, culminating in a 2022 arbitration ruling requiring Duoge to return 31.06 million yuan, which was not fulfilled, prompting further legal actions [3][4]. - In October 2024, Chen Cong publicly accused Aobo of colluding with Tianxing to undermine "Dongqiudi," which sparked significant user discussions and negative comments affecting "Live Bar's" brand reputation [4][5]. Group 3: Court's Findings - The court found that the terms "collusion" and "setup" were presented as established facts without sufficient evidence, constituting defamation [5]. - The defendants are required to delete five specific articles within three days and issue a public apology within seven days, with the apology content subject to court approval and to remain visible for at least 30 days [5].