专家分析美方对马杜罗所谓“审判”：实为政治问题，攻防激烈

Group 1 - The core argument of the article is that the Venezuelan Attorney General, Saab, is urging U.S. judges to recognize Maduro's absolute personal immunity as the President of Venezuela, asserting that any trial against him is fundamentally a political issue rather than a judicial one [1][3] - Saab emphasizes that the current head of state enjoys absolute personal immunity, which is not only a personal right but also a constitutional principle with universal effect and a fundamental tenet of international law [1] - The article notes that since 2024, the U.S. has attempted to deny Maduro's status as a leader, labeling a rival candidate, Edmundo González, as the "legitimate president" [2] Group 2 - The article draws a parallel between the current situation regarding Maduro and the historical case of Manuel Noriega, the former leader of Panama, who was subjected to U.S. military action and subsequent legal proceedings [3] - It is reported that the U.S. military action against Panama in 1989 resulted in significant civilian casualties and was justified under the pretext of protecting citizens and restoring democracy [3] - Analysts suggest that the legal proceedings against Maduro will be complex and protracted, with the possibility of him remaining in the U.S. for an extended period before a final ruling is made [3]