成都女子卖“许愿蜡烛”被跨省抓捕,控诉辽源警方“远洋捕捞”
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-07 13:11

Core Viewpoint - The case of the "wish candle fraud" has sparked significant attention and controversy, highlighting the intersection of belief in metaphysical services and legal definitions of fraud in China [3][21][15]. Group 1: Case Background - The accused, Li Moufan, gained fame through a reality show and established a company selling various types of "wish candles" that promise to help fulfill customers' desires [5][22]. - The candles are marketed with different themes such as wealth, reconciliation, and personal transformation, with prices ranging from 2,888 yuan to 5,888 yuan [7][24]. - The company reportedly refunded over 2.83 million yuan to 253 customers between 2019 and 2024, indicating a willingness to address customer dissatisfaction [8][25]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The case was initiated when a customer, Ms. L, reported being defrauded, leading to a rapid police investigation and the arrest of Li and her associates [26][15]. - The prosecution claims that Li's company defrauded customers of over 51.5 million yuan by promoting the candles as tools to achieve wishes, which they argue constitutes fraud [31]. - Legal experts have debated the classification of the actions as fraud, suggesting that the nature of the service provided aligns more with emotional support rather than deceit [31][32]. Group 3: Expert Opinions - Experts argue that the promotional claims about the candles assisting in wish fulfillment fall under predictions about future events rather than false representations of fact, which is a key element in defining fraud [16][32]. - The belief in metaphysical practices, such as wish candles, is seen as a personal choice, and the existence of a refund policy further complicates the argument for fraud [17][33]. - There is concern that classifying such services as fraud could lead to broader implications for various metaphysical and spiritual services, challenging the legal boundaries of consumer protection [33][34].