漫评丨演都不演了!美国“霸权剧本”如今已撕下所有伪装
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-07 14:04

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the U.S. military intervention in Venezuela as a strategic move to control oil resources under the guise of combating drug trafficking and terrorism [2][3][6] - The U.S. has a historical pattern of intervening in Latin American countries, often using pretexts of restoring order or fighting against perceived threats, while the underlying motive remains the control of oil and resources [3][4][5] - The recent actions against Venezuelan President Maduro are seen as part of a broader strategy to secure U.S. dominance in the global oil market and maintain the supremacy of the U.S. dollar [3][6] Group 2 - The U.S. has explicitly stated its intention to push major oil companies into Venezuela to invest in and repair the country's oil infrastructure, indicating a clear economic motive behind the military actions [2][3] - The term "oil" was mentioned 26 times in a White House press conference, compared to only a few mentions of "drugs," further emphasizing the focus on oil rather than the stated reasons for intervention [3] - The U.S. has issued warnings to neighboring countries like Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico, suggesting that military actions may extend beyond Venezuela, showcasing an aggressive stance towards maintaining control over the region's resources [6]