新华时评丨一场非法荒唐的“审判”

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes the recent court proceedings in the U.S. against Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife, labeling it as an illegal and absurd "trial" that exemplifies power politics rather than legitimate judicial processes [1][2][3]. Summary by Sections Trial Legitimacy - The trial is deemed illegal under international law, which establishes the principle of "no jurisdiction between equals," asserting that one country's court cannot adjudicate the actions of another sovereign state [4]. - Legal experts argue that Maduro possesses absolute immunity in foreign courts, regardless of U.S. recognition of his presidency, making the trial a case of "judicial hegemony" [4]. Implementation of the Trial - The U.S. actions are characterized as a military invasion and unlawful seizure of a foreign leader, violating the principles of sovereignty and non-interference in domestic affairs as outlined in the UN Charter [2][5]. - The article describes U.S. behavior as reckless imperialism and a blatant disregard for international norms [5]. U.S. Global Conduct - The U.S. continues to flaunt its military power and issue threats to other nations despite international condemnation, positioning itself as an "international police" while prioritizing its domestic laws over international law [6]. - Historical patterns of U.S. intervention, from Panama to Venezuela, illustrate a long-standing logic of hegemony, with the recent trial being the latest manifestation of this approach [6]. - The article concludes that a nation relying on coercion and military force to maintain its so-called leadership cannot earn global respect, suggesting that the true defendants should be those who violate international law and disregard the sovereignty of others [6].