国社评：美国以“家法帮规”践踏国际规则

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the absurdity of the trial of Venezuelan President Maduro in a U.S. court, highlighting it as an act of power politics rather than a legitimate judicial process [1][3]. Group 1: Legal and International Relations - The trial is deemed illegal under international law, which establishes the principle of sovereign equality, meaning one country's court has no jurisdiction over another sovereign state's government actions [3]. - International law grants Maduro absolute immunity in foreign courts, regardless of U.S. recognition of him as a head of state, making the trial a case of judicial hegemony [3]. - The U.S. actions are characterized as a violation of the United Nations Charter principles, including respect for sovereignty and non-interference in domestic affairs [3][4]. Group 2: U.S. Foreign Policy and Military Actions - The article criticizes the U.S. for using military force to intervene in other countries' affairs, labeling it as imperialistic and reckless behavior [4]. - Historical context is provided, noting that the U.S. has a long-standing pattern of infringing on other nations' sovereignty under the guise of law enforcement, exemplified by past military actions in Panama and Venezuela [4]. - The narrative suggests that a country relying on coercion and military might to maintain its so-called leadership cannot earn global respect [4].