“AI幻觉”侵入法庭，多地法院探索治理机制

Core Insights - The article discusses the emergence of "AI hallucination" in the legal field, where AI-generated content appears real but is actually false or misleading, leading to significant challenges in judicial processes [3][4][6]. Group 1: Impact on Judicial Processes - AI hallucination has caused disruptions in judicial order, with instances of lawyers submitting AI-generated cases that do not correspond to real legal situations [4]. - Courts are facing challenges as parties use AI tools to draft legal documents and cite fictitious laws, undermining the integrity of legal proceedings [4][6]. - The phenomenon has led to cases where evidence is fabricated using AI, creating false impressions of infringement or misconduct [4]. Group 2: Legal Community's Response - Judicial authorities are actively working to establish mechanisms to identify and mitigate the risks associated with AI-generated content [7]. - Courts are implementing strict review processes for submitted materials, particularly those suspected of containing AI-generated content, and are advising parties to disclose AI assistance [7]. - There is a call for legal professionals to exercise caution and verify the accuracy of AI-generated information, as reliance on such content can weaken the authority of legal norms [6][7]. Group 3: Technological and Regulatory Recommendations - Recommendations include enhancing AI content verification processes and linking AI generation to authoritative legal databases to reduce the occurrence of AI hallucination [7]. - Legal institutions are encouraged to adopt measures such as penalties for submitting false AI-generated materials, emphasizing the importance of honesty in legal proceedings [7]. - The integration of AI in legal work is seen as inevitable, but the limitations of technology must be acknowledged, with human oversight remaining essential in judicial decision-making [7].