国际人士谴责美国对委内瑞拉发动军事行动

Core Viewpoint - The recent military action by the U.S. against Venezuela, including the forced control of President Maduro, has drawn widespread condemnation from various political leaders and regional organizations, highlighting a resurgence of "Monroe Doctrine" in contemporary context [1][3] Group 1: Political Reactions - Multiple international figures have criticized the U.S. military action as an infringement on Venezuela's sovereignty and a broader attempt to reassert U.S. dominance in Latin America, particularly concerning resource control, especially oil [1] - The former Ecuadorian Foreign Minister, Guillaume Long, emphasized that the U.S. actions are about power dynamics and resource competition, which violate the sovereignty of Venezuela and Latin America as a whole [1] - Brazilian political science professor, Cristina Pecequilo, warned that non-compliance with U.S. policies could lead to severe consequences, opening the door for further political and military interventions that threaten sovereignty [1] Group 2: Legal and Ethical Concerns - Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense, Fulin Min, described the military action as an unwarranted act of aggression, arguing that it exceeds the Monroe Doctrine and represents a push for U.S. hegemony in the hemisphere [3] - He stated that the military action violates U.S. constitutional law, as Congress did not authorize the use of force against another sovereign nation, particularly in the context of detaining a head of state [3] - The actions taken against Venezuela are not only against U.S. law but also contravene numerous international legal standards [3]