“新门罗主义”比老版更“美国优先”更赤裸霸道

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the resurgence of the Monroe Doctrine in U.S. foreign policy, particularly under the Trump administration, which has been termed "New Monroeism." This approach emphasizes U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere and has led to military interventions, notably in Venezuela, raising concerns about violations of international law and the implications for Latin America and global order [1][5][11]. Historical Context - The Monroe Doctrine, articulated by President James Monroe in 1823, established a framework for U.S. foreign policy, asserting that the Americas should be free from European colonialism and interference [3][4]. - The doctrine has evolved through two significant iterations: the Roosevelt Corollary in 1904, which justified U.S. intervention in Latin America, and the recent "Trump Doctrine," which reasserts U.S. interests in the region [4][5]. New Monroeism Characteristics - The "New Monroeism" is characterized by a more aggressive and interventionist stance, focusing on military deployment, economic pressure, and direct intervention in Latin American affairs [6][7]. - The Trump administration's national security strategy identifies the Western Hemisphere as a core interest area, with explicit goals to reclaim U.S. dominance and prevent foreign influence [5][9]. Military and Economic Strategies - The U.S. has employed military force and economic sanctions as primary tools in its "New Monroeism," contrasting with the more diplomatic approaches of the past [8][12]. - Recent actions include military deployments near Venezuela and sanctions against countries like Colombia and Cuba, aimed at controlling resources and curbing perceived threats to U.S. security [9][10]. Implications for Latin America - The focus on Venezuela is particularly notable due to its vast oil reserves and alliances with countries like China and Russia, which the U.S. views as challenges to its influence [9][12]. - The article suggests that the "New Monroeism" could lead to increased instability in Latin America, as the U.S. prioritizes its interests over regional autonomy and development [1][11].