一口气再退66个群，美国“软实力”或进一步下滑

Group 1 - The White House announced the U.S. withdrawal from 66 international organizations deemed "not in the interest of the U.S." This includes stopping participation and funding for 35 non-UN organizations and 31 UN agencies [1] - The organizations targeted are said to promote radical climate policies and global governance that conflict with U.S. sovereignty and economic strength [1] - Trump's withdrawal actions reflect his "America First" policy, motivated by economic interests, domestic populism, and a desire to reshape U.S. hegemony [1] Group 2 - The U.S. is the largest contributor to the World Health Organization (WHO), and its funding cuts have led to a budget reduction of over 20%, resulting in layoffs [2] - The unilateral exit from the Paris Climate Agreement has drawn widespread international criticism, potentially undermining global emission reduction efforts and increasing uncertainty in climate governance [2] - Critics argue that Trump's unilateralism diminishes international organization resources, reduces governance effectiveness, and harms global stability, leading to a decline in U.S. international image and soft power [2] Group 3 - A professor of international relations warned that neglecting the value of soft power could escalate military competition, increasing the risk of global conflict [3] - The "Global Soft Power Index 2025" indicated that under Trump's leadership, the U.S. international reputation has declined to 15th place, with worsening indicators in governance, human values, and reliability [3] - The U.S. has historically dominated the establishment of international rules and norms, benefiting from its soft power, but this advantage is rapidly diminishing [3]