新华时评：一场非法荒唐的“审判”

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes the recent trial of Venezuelan President Maduro in a U.S. court as an act of "judicial hegemony" and a violation of international law, asserting that it represents a blatant display of power politics by the U.S. [1][2][3] Group 1: Legal and International Relations - The trial is deemed illegal under international law, which grants heads of state absolute immunity in foreign courts, regardless of U.S. recognition of Maduro as president [1] - The U.S. actions are characterized as a violation of the principles of sovereignty, non-interference, and peaceful resolution of international disputes as outlined in the UN Charter [2] - The U.S. is accused of prioritizing its domestic laws over international law, positioning itself as an "international judge" and undermining multilateralism [3] Group 2: U.S. Foreign Policy and Military Actions - The article highlights a history of U.S. military interventions, such as in Panama and Venezuela, as examples of its long-standing hegemonic behavior [3] - The U.S. is portrayed as relying on coercion, sanctions, and military actions to maintain its so-called leadership, which ultimately undermines its global respect [3] - The narrative suggests that the U.S. is acting recklessly and unlawfully, with its recent actions being the latest in a series of imperialistic endeavors [2][3]