马上评｜最高法纠正法官姓名“打码”，有公开才有公正

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China has emphasized the importance of transparency in judicial proceedings by stating that the names of judges and case numbers should not be anonymized in published court documents, correcting previous errors made by some local courts [1][3]. Group 1: Judicial Transparency - The publication of court judgments online is a fundamental aspect of judicial transparency, allowing the public to understand case facts, legal bases, and verdicts, thereby enhancing the public's right to know about judicial activities [1][2]. - The practice of publishing court documents online has been a significant reform since the 18th National Congress, with the Central Committee highlighting its importance in promoting judicial fairness and public legal education [2]. Group 2: Accountability of Judges - Judges' names should be publicly displayed in online judgments to reflect their accountability for the judicial process and outcomes, ensuring that the judiciary is open to scrutiny [2][3]. - The principle of "experiential" justice emphasizes that judicial personnel must personally engage in the entire case process to ensure fairness and integrity in judgments [2]. Group 3: Balancing Public Interest and Privacy - While promoting transparency, it is essential to balance public interest with individual rights, particularly in protecting personal privacy to avoid "secondary harm" to victims [3]. - The Supreme Court has clarified that judges' names and case numbers do not fall under personal privacy or state secrets, and their inclusion is necessary for demonstrating the credibility of judicial fairness [3].