突袭委内瑞拉强掳马杜罗 “美式霸权”引发广泛谴责

Core Viewpoint - The recent U.S. military intervention in Venezuela aims to control the country's vast oil resources, reshape regional influence, and bolster domestic political support for the Trump administration ahead of the 2026 midterm elections [7][8][11]. Group 1: U.S. Strategic Motivations - The U.S. military action is driven by Venezuela's significant oil reserves, which are crucial for both the Venezuelan economy and the international energy market [7]. - Trump has announced plans to send U.S. oil companies to Venezuela, investing $1 billion to restore the country's oil infrastructure, indicating a focus on economic benefits for the U.S. [7]. - The intervention is also seen as a way to reinforce U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere, aligning with the 2025 National Security Strategy that prioritizes the region [8]. Group 2: Legitimacy and International Response - The U.S. Justice Department has charged Maduro with drug-related crimes, but experts question the legitimacy of these claims, citing a lack of evidence for direct government involvement in attacks against the U.S. [9]. - The military action has faced criticism for violating international law and undermining Venezuela's sovereignty, with U.S. domestic political divisions emerging over the lack of congressional authorization for the intervention [9][10]. Group 3: Implications for Venezuela - Maduro's potential long-term control could lead to political instability, as his absence would disrupt the existing power balance, with the Vice President temporarily taking over [11]. - The opposition is seizing the opportunity to gain international recognition and support, viewing Maduro's situation as a critical moment for political change [12]. - The ongoing political uncertainty is likely to exacerbate Venezuela's existing social and economic crises, leading to increased inflation, shortages, and potential civil unrest [13].