特朗普再发声：必须“拥有”整个格陵兰！白宫“购岛”方案流出，若该计划落实，每名格陵兰居民或能得到1万至10万美元不等的款项

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that President Trump insists on the necessity for the U.S. to "own" Greenland, emphasizing that ownership has strategic value beyond what can be obtained through treaties or leases [1][3]. - Trump has expressed dissatisfaction with the current arrangement established by a 1951 treaty, which allows the U.S. to set up military bases in Greenland with Danish consent, stating that more direct control is needed [3][5]. - Senior representatives from Denmark and Greenland met with White House officials to discuss the situation, with U.S. officials attempting to downplay Trump's statements about "taking over" Greenland [3][8]. Group 2 - Vice President Pence warned European leaders to take Trump's comments about Greenland seriously, indicating that the U.S. may take action if European countries do not address security concerns related to Greenland [5][6]. - A proposal for the U.S. to purchase Greenland has surfaced, suggesting a one-time payment to Greenland residents to encourage them to separate from Denmark and potentially join the U.S., although details remain unclear [6][8]. - The EU's foreign policy chief expressed serious concerns over the U.S. threats regarding Greenland, calling for respect for international law and indicating that the EU is discussing responses to potential U.S. military threats [6][8]. Group 3 - The situation has led to strong criticism from various European nations and U.S. lawmakers, emphasizing that only Denmark and Greenland have the right to decide on matters concerning the island [11][13]. - There is a growing sentiment that the U.S. actions could significantly damage transatlantic relations, with some U.S. Congress members accusing the government of disrespecting international law and national sovereignty [11][13]. - Analysts suggest that if the U.S. were to use military force regarding Greenland, it would mark the end of the alliance between the U.S. and Europe, highlighting the unilateral approach of the U.S. in this matter [17][19].