Core Viewpoint - The article highlights President Trump's assertion that his personal "moral standards and will" are the only constraints on his military actions globally, dismissing the need for international law [3][4]. Group 1: Military Actions and Global Influence - Trump claims that he can freely use military, economic, or political means to reinforce U.S. hegemony, suggesting that national power should dictate international relations rather than laws or treaties [3]. - Under Trump's administration, the U.S. has conducted military strikes in seven countries, matching the total number of strikes during Obama's eight-year term, with over 620 airstrikes ordered since his second term began [5]. - The U.S. has a historical pattern of military interventions, with 392 recorded since its founding, indicating a trend of increasing military engagement post-1950 [6]. Group 2: Political and Social Implications - Experts warn that the U.S.'s misuse of military force and disregard for international law could lead to regional instability, exacerbating issues like illegal immigration and drug trafficking [6][7]. - The perception of low costs and difficulties associated with military interventions may encourage the Trump administration to pursue more aggressive actions in the future [6]. - Historical analysis suggests that rapid military actions often lead to disastrous outcomes, raising concerns about the long-term political consequences of such interventions [7].
特朗普:我不需要国际法,我个人的“道德标准和意志”是唯一限制!他上任不到1年已打7国,下令空袭620次,对没拿诺贝尔和平奖很不满
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen·2026-01-09 10:43