处罚信息超期公示，企业背上“信用包袱”

Group 1 - The company faced significant challenges in business operations due to a five-year public disclosure of an administrative penalty, which was a result of selling prescription drugs while the licensed pharmacist was temporarily absent [1] - The penalty of 900 yuan had been paid, but the prolonged public disclosure negatively impacted the company's ability to bid and secure loans, requiring extensive explanations to potential partners [1][2] - The issue was identified by the Lan'kao County Procuratorate, which discovered that multiple administrative agencies had failed to differentiate between general and serious violations, leading to excessive public disclosure periods [1][2] Group 2 - In response to the findings, the Lan'kao County Procuratorate organized a meeting with relevant authorities to address the issue of excessive public disclosure and reached a consensus on the need for immediate rectification [2][3] - The county's Development and Reform Commission took prompt action to rectify the situation by launching a special initiative to remove over a hundred instances of excessive public disclosure, including that of the company [3] - A collaborative mechanism for social credit repair was established, which aims to standardize the processes of credit information collection, public disclosure, repair, and supervision, thereby enhancing the legal framework for the social credit system [3]