征求意见，只征不用？警惕意见征集中的官僚主义、形式主义

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ineffectiveness of the public opinion solicitation process in various government departments, emphasizing that it often devolves into a mere formality rather than a genuine effort to gather valuable feedback from stakeholders [1][3][4]. Group 1: Issues in Public Opinion Solicitation - Many organizations report that their submitted opinions during legislative meetings remain unread, indicating a lack of genuine engagement from the authorities [2]. - The process often involves bureaucratic inefficiencies, such as sending out mass emails to unrelated departments, leading to unhelpful feedback [2]. - Some departments only seek opinions to fulfill procedural requirements, disregarding the actual suggestions provided by stakeholders [3]. Group 2: Consequences of Ineffective Solicitation - The superficial approach to soliciting opinions undermines the scientific nature of decision-making and erodes public trust in government [4][6]. - Ignoring valuable public input stifles social innovation and progress, as it prevents the dissemination of new ideas and methods [6]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - To enhance the effectiveness of opinion solicitation, departments should broaden the channels for feedback, including social media and official websites, and ensure timely responses to public submissions [7][8]. - Valuable suggestions should be actively considered and integrated into policy discussions, with feedback provided to the public on how their input is being utilized [8]. - Establishing a robust oversight mechanism to hold departments accountable for bureaucratic practices can help transform the procedural value of opinion solicitation into a positive driving force for improvement [9].