Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen·2026-01-10 03:44Core Viewpoint - The article discusses ST Yuan Zhi's (002689) strategy of using real estate to offset debts as a means to improve its financial situation amidst significant accounts receivable challenges, highlighting a specific agreement with Yunnan Urban Construction Investment Co., Ltd. for a debt settlement of 2.716 million yuan [1][3]. Group 1: Debt Settlement Agreement - ST Yuan Zhi has entered into a debt settlement agreement with Yunnan Urban Construction Investment Co., Ltd. to offset a debt of 2.716 million yuan through real estate [1][3]. - The agreement involves multiple parties, including the debtor, the creditor, and the property holding company, indicating a complex debt restructuring process [3]. - If the debt settlement is successfully implemented, it is expected to increase the company's pre-tax profit by approximately 230.6 thousand yuan for the year 2026 [2][5]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The transaction is anticipated to have a significant positive impact on ST Yuan Zhi's financial statements, reducing uncertainty related to accounts receivable and accelerating the collection process [4][6]. - The company had previously made provisions for bad debts related to this receivable, meaning that the successful resolution of this debt will directly release profits [4][5]. - Despite the potential profit increase, the company still faces a substantial total accounts receivable of over 400 million yuan, indicating that this settlement is only a small part of a larger issue [6][7]. Group 3: Challenges and Market Context - The real estate assets involved in the debt settlement are located in Lianghe County, Yunnan, and their liquidity may be a concern, especially compared to properties in first and second-tier cities [6][9]. - The company has acknowledged that the performance of its accounts receivable is closely tied to the financial health of its real estate clients, which poses ongoing risks [9]. - The management has indicated plans to enhance customer risk assessment mechanisms and may resort to legal measures to manage accounts receivable risks [9].